by 
Former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposed 28-point “peace plan” for ending the Ukraine–Russia war has triggered one of the most intense diplomatic debates of the entire conflict. While Trump presents the plan as a fast path to peace, many in Kyiv and across Europe see it as a dangerous form of forced capitulation that rewards aggression and undermines Ukraine’s long-term security.
What Trump’s 28-Point Plan Proposes
According to media reports and leaked documents, the plan focuses on four pillars: ending the war, Ukraine’s security, Europe’s security architecture, and relations between the U.S., Russia and Ukraine.
The most controversial elements include:
• Major territorial concessions
Ukraine would be asked to cede large areas to Russia, including full recognition of Russian control over Crimea and the entire Donbas region. The existing front line would become a de facto border.
• Permanent ban on NATO membership
Ukraine would have to amend its constitution to guarantee it will never join NATO, while the Alliance would formally codify that Ukraine is barred from membership indefinitely.
• Limits on the Ukrainian military
Trump’s plan reportedly demands strict caps on Ukraine’s army size, a ban on long-range missiles, and intrusive monitoring mechanisms to enforce compliance.
• Conditional security guarantees
The U.S. would offer security guarantees, but with clauses stating that if Ukraine ever “attacks Russia,” the guarantees immediately expire. NATO troops would not be allowed to operate inside Ukraine.
• Reconstruction funded by frozen Russian assets
Up to $100 billion in frozen Russian assets would be used to rebuild Ukraine — an attempt to frame the plan as a “balanced” peace deal.
For Russia, these terms are highly favorable. For Ukraine, they are deeply painful.
Zelensky’s Dilemma: Dignity or Support?
President Volodymyr Zelensky has described the situation as “one of the most difficult moments in Ukraine’s history.” He called Trump’s proposed terms an “impossible choice” — accept humiliating concessions or risk losing U.S. military and political support.
Zelensky stressed several key principles:
- Ukraine seeks real peace, not a paper deal that legalizes occupation.
- Any agreement must not reward aggression or sacrifice national sovereignty.
- Kyiv is open to dialogue, but not at the cost of its independence.
Pressure From Washington: A Thanksgiving Deadline
Reports indicate that Trump’s team has set a strict deadline — Thanksgiving — for Ukraine to decide whether it will accept the plan. If not, Washington may reduce or suspend military aid, a move that could drastically weaken Ukraine’s defenses.
This ultimatum creates several risks:
- A collapse of Ukraine’s front-line capabilities without U.S. support
- Internal political turmoil in Kyiv
- Increased pressure on Zelensky from both allies and opposition
- Fear among Ukrainians that the country could be abandoned
Europe’s Response: Solidarity With Ukraine, Fear of a Split
European leaders — particularly in the U.K., Germany and France — insist that any peace agreement must be just, stable, and aligned with international law. Many fear that a U.S.-driven deal could sideline Europe and divide Western unity.
At major diplomatic meetings in London and Brussels, European officials stressed that peace cannot be built by forcing Ukraine to surrender territory.
However, Europe faces a dilemma:
- No EU country wants to openly oppose the U.S.
- European societies strongly reject rewarding Russia for aggression
- There is growing debate over whether Europe must prepare to guarantee Ukraine’s security independently if Washington steps back
Corruption Scandals in Ukraine: Fuel for Trump’s Argument
Several recent corruption scandals involving high-level Ukrainian officials have weakened Kyiv politically and provided Trump’s team with rhetorical ammunition — the argument that billions in aid are being sent to a “corrupt system” and that the war must end now.
Zelensky is attempting to purge corrupt structures while keeping national unity intact.
What This “Peace” Would Mean for Ukraine — and the World
If the Trump plan were implemented in full, its consequences could reshape global geopolitics:
1. Dangerous precedent
Russia would gain territory through brutal military aggression, encouraging similar behavior from authoritarian states.
2. Ukraine’s long-term vulnerability
Without NATO membership and with a restricted military, Ukraine could become a neutral buffer state, exposed to future Russian pressure.
3. Fragmentation of Western unity
A forced settlement could split the U.S. and Europe, weakening the collective deterrence that has helped stabilize Europe for decades.
4. Instability inside Ukraine
Any agreement involving territorial loss could trigger protests, political upheaval, and even a change of leadership in Kyiv.
Conclusion: A Peace Price the World May Not Be Ready to Pay
Trump’s 28-point plan is officially presented as a “realistic compromise” that ends the war quickly and unlocks funds to rebuild Ukraine. But critics argue it resembles a deal made on Russia’s terms, leaving Ukraine to decide between survival and sovereignty.
Zelensky’s message remains firm: peace is essential — but not a peace that destroys Ukraine’s future.
The coming weeks, diplomatic negotiations, and the Thanksgiving deadline will determine whether this plan becomes a turning point in the war or a catalyst for an even deeper crisis.
